Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kenrailae wrote: Because you can't have 2 worlds function under entirely different rules and co-exist. It doesn't work. It would be like TQ being able to cross market with the Chinese Server. They would inherently break one, the other, or both....
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.11 02:47:00
|
2. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kenrailae wrote: Eva Rourge wrote: Alright, so basically NO to the second shard. No to Americans and No to any software development that would require CCP to abandon 10 year-old military hardware and Python plagued software. Also No to limb ...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.11 02:28:00
|
3. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Derath Ellecon wrote: Eva Rourge wrote: Alright, so basically NO to the second shard. No to Americans and No to any software development that would require CCP to abandon 10 year-old military hardware and Python plagued software. Also No to ...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.11 02:22:00
|
4. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Alright, so basically NO to the second shard. No to Americans and No to any software development that would require CCP to abandon 10 year-old military hardware and Python plagued software. Also No to limb amputation. Fine. Anything else?
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.11 02:13:00
|
5. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Derath Ellecon wrote: Eva Rourge wrote: For the last time now: game X is perfect but it will not last, at least not unless it evolves. I love my left arm but if it catches gangrene I will cut it off. ... Things are only impossible until th...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.11 02:10:00
|
6. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
masternerdguy wrote: Eva Rourge wrote: For the last time now: game X is perfect but it will not last, at least not unless it evolves. I love my left arm but if it catches gangrene I will cut it off. The end. EVE won't last either if your ...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.11 02:08:00
|
7. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
For the last time now: game X is perfect but it will not last, at least not unless it evolves. I love my left arm but if it catches gangrene I will cut it off. ... Things are only impossible until they are not? Sounds perfectly adequate in this ...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.11 01:56:00
|
8. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: Eva Rourge wrote: What is your problem with someone suggesting something other than what you have in your head at the moment? Is this a discussion board or an inquisition chamber for those who date to speak their mind? ...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.11 01:46:00
|
9. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nariya Kentaya wrote: ShahFluffers wrote: Eva Rourge wrote: Acquisition of hardware and initial installation would be required but based an a previously scripted and tested scenario (hardware is getting cheaper literally by the minute). ...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.11 01:01:00
|
10. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Captain StringfellowHawk wrote: Go get Limit Theory. Your dream completed. Leave our game alone. Did I somehow offend you or your game? Are you scared I'm going to take away your security blanket? Fear no more, only a few hours left until ...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.11 00:51:00
|
11. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Eva Rourge wrote: A few good points here but let me respond in short: no hardware changes or balancing would be required at all. It would require a completely new TQ. That's a lot of hardware right there. It would require com...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.10 23:33:00
|
12. WTS: 58mil SP focused PvP pilot - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Cindi Ly wrote: isk and account info send ISK received. Trasnfer in progress: We are currently processing this transfer. The character being transferred will remain on your account until the process is complete, but will not be playable du...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.10 21:37:00
|
13. WTS: 58mil SP focused PvP pilot - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Cindi Ly wrote: 18.1 bil can pay now Accepted. Pending payment. Thank you.
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.10 19:48:00
|
14. WTS: 58mil SP focused PvP pilot - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Dawa Xadi wrote: 17 bil Thank you. I will give the 18bil offer until tomorrow to come through with the payment before I commit.
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.10 18:16:00
|
15. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Eva Rourge wrote: A) New Eden would still be one shard as it is now. No, it wouldn't. That's the whole point of your suggestion. Quote: Where is the call to compromise? In your suggestion to alter the game for an audience...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.10 18:14:00
|
16. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: Eva Rourge wrote: Now, what could we possibly do to satisfy the above requirements? Create a new world - a new sandbox, one connected to New Eden but one with a completely different set of rules and regulations. The two ...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.10 17:30:00
|
17. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Eva Rourge wrote: How would it exactly? It would no longer be a single, unsharded universe. Also, your premise #4 is highly suspect. There's nothing wrong with people not liking the game. If you want to appeal to a bigger aud...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.10 17:26:00
|
18. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote: I thought losec and null were there to make PvP better...so make it better there? Keep the CCP development concentrated in one area would be best I think. How much "development" have you seen lately? I am proposing...
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.10 17:20:00
|
19. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Double post from the phone... Grr
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.10 17:16:00
|
20. A second sandbox - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: That would defeat the entire purpose of the game. How would it exactly? New Eden would stay untouched (or become a more dangerous place). What purpose would be defeated?
- by Eva Rourge - at 2014.04.10 17:15:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |